docs: improve code documentation- v5

[zazie-codes]

Task #6383

Make sure these boxes are signed before submitting your Pull Request -- thank you.

• I have read the contributing guide lines at https://docs.suricata.io/en/latest/devguide/codebase/contributing/contribution-process.html
• I have signed the Open Information Security Foundation contribution agreement at https://suricata.io/about/contribution-agreement/
• I have updated the user guide (in doc/userguide/) to reflect the changes made (if applicable)

Link to redmine ticket:https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6383

Describe changes:
This is an update of #9649
-squashed all commits.
-added the space in layer src/app-layer-htp-libhtp.h
-interchanged file description to come after author credentials to conform to guidelines.

[github-actions]

NOTE: This PR may contain new authors:

Liza Opar <oparliza@gmail.com>

[zazie-codes]

I've noticed a clang format error. Im correcting it right now.

[jufajardini]

I've noticed a clang format error. Im correcting it right now.

Nice :)

I'm a bit confused with the CI checks, as they seem to be linking the checks to PR #9611. Could you please, just in case, rebase your branch to Suricata newest master, when applying the formatting fixes? Not sure what is making GH link the workflows like that...

[zazie-codes]

I've noticed a clang format error. Im correcting it right now.

Nice :)

I'm a bit confused with the CI checks, as they seem to be linking the checks to PR #9611. Could you please, just in case, rebase your branch to Suricata newest master, when applying the formatting fixes? Not sure what is making GH link the workflows like that...

In not certain but could it be because i used a new branch that the master will commit from?

[github-actions]

NOTE: This PR may contain new authors:

Liza Opar <oparliza@gmail.com>

[jufajardini]

I've noticed a clang format error. Im correcting it right now.

Nice :)
I'm a bit confused with the CI checks, as they seem to be linking the checks to PR #9611. Could you please, just in case, rebase your branch to Suricata newest master, when applying the formatting fixes? Not sure what is making GH link the workflows like that...

In not certain but could it be because i used a new branch that the master will commit from?

Not sure, but Shivani re-ran the CI checks, and now it has passed. Maybe github had a hiccup...

[jufajardini]

Looks good to me, thanks :)

[victorjulien]

Merged in #9701, thanks!