New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
proj -le still enlists 'International 1909 (Hayford)' instead of 'International 1924' #2534
Comments
@florisvdh yes - it would indeed make sense to change the The Hayford ellipsoid was based on investigations in 1909, published in 1910 as J.F. Hayford: Supplementary Investigation in 1909 of the Figure of the Earth and Isostasy, Coast and Geodetic Survey, 80pp. (freely accessible through Google Books). In 1924 Hayford's ellipsoid was adopted by the IUGG as "the International Ellipsoid". Hence either of
would be reasonable names, but the "International, 1909" really is a peculiar mix of concepts. |
Thank you for providing this interesting background @busstoptaktik! I understand the alternatives you enlist would all be equivalent. I think the advantage of changing to 'International 1924' would be syntactical consistency with EPSG:7022 and the WKT strings in which it is used, in order to avoid confusion. |
Ellipsoid names are defined here: https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/blob/master/src/ellps.cpp Feel free to open a pull request that fixes this. |
The "International 1909 (Hayford)" designation is an unfortunate mix of different aspects of the same ellipsoid. The Hayford ellipsoid was based on investigations in 1909, published in 1910 as J.F. Hayford: *Supplementary Investigation in 1909 of the Figure of the Earth and Isostasy*, Coast and Geodetic Survey, 80pp. (freely accessible through Google Books). In 1924 Hayford's ellipsoid was adopted by the IUGG as "the International Ellipsoid". Hence either of - Hayford, 1909 (for the year the work was done), - Hayford, 1910 (for the year of publication), or - International, 1924 are reasonable names, in common use, but the "International, 1909" really is a peculiar mix of concepts. Resolves #2534
The
( Not clear to me is if it is a goal to keep both data sources connected: Here maybe the broader description See #2537 for general issue on this. |
@florisvdh ideally all ellipsoid information is read from the database, similar to |
Example of problem
Problem description
In the list of ellipsoids of
proj -le
, an older name is still used for the international ellipsoid. I'd expect it should be changed to 'International 1924' (EPSG:7022), cf. the output ofprojinfo
. In both cases, reference is made to the PROJ nameintl
.Maybe there are other such non-conforming cases in the output of
proj -le
, I think this should be checked.Expected Output
Environment Information
Installation method
apt-get, with ubuntugis-unstable PPA
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: