Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc: gdalwarp: clarify that -t_srs might still be needed when using -ct (fixes #8242) #8243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2023

Conversation

rouault
Copy link
Member

@rouault rouault commented Aug 20, 2023

No description provided.

@bpurinton
Copy link

@rouault That does work, I tested it. But I guess now I'm confused, because I thought the ct proj pipeline is an alternative to using the t_srs; or, is it the case that the ct option would allow a different pipeline (if projinfo showed a few options), overriding the t_srs option?

I actually tested this by adding a slight y-offset in the proj pipeline (while still including the t_srs). Indeed, it seems that the ct options did override the standard t_srs usage.

In that case, perhaps my suggested change to the documentation is useful?

@bpurinton
Copy link

LGTM, thanks for the prompt help @rouault!

@rouault rouault merged commit a7ee4d8 into OSGeo:master Aug 21, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants