Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vat message for b2b users with valid ustid #495

Conversation

keywan-ghadami-oxid
Copy link
Contributor

vat messages say vat is included in the price but that's wrong
https://bugs.oxid-esales.com/view.php?id=6516

@mparienti mparienti force-pushed the fix-do-not-bill-vat-if-valid-vatid branch from 2516650 to f87206f Compare October 5, 2016 09:05
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 5, 2016

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@mparienti mparienti force-pushed the fix-do-not-bill-vat-if-valid-vatid branch from f87206f to b4bcae7 Compare October 5, 2016 09:15
@keywan-ghadami-oxid
Copy link
Contributor Author

just realized that there might be a better way to fix this by using getUserVat from VatSelector class
https://github.com/OXID-eSales/oxideshop_ce/blob/master/source/Application/Model/VatSelector.php#L59

@Sieg
Copy link
Member

Sieg commented Sep 26, 2017

Hello @keywan-ghadami-oxid, thanks for your pull request. Are you planning to make further improvements on this pull request?

@Sieg
Copy link
Member

Sieg commented Dec 14, 2017

Hello @keywan-ghadami-oxid, some points to update the pull request:

  • Cant we use getFieldData method to get values?
  • How about strict comparison for values (===) so checking for null will be not needed.

@Sieg Sieg self-assigned this May 10, 2018
Sieg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2018
@Sieg
Copy link
Member

Sieg commented May 11, 2018

Thank you for your pull request. It was adjusted a little by latest code, and I have merged it at fa16a93. Have a nice day.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants