You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2021. It is now read-only.
Hi, I see that you've pinned to rxjs version 5.2.0 instead of following semver with something like ^5.2.0. I am also using rxjs in my add-in, but at a different (more recent) version. Because of this, I now have two versions of the same package being bundled. Is it possible to use a more generous range for rxjs in this package?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@IanVS Sure, we can upgrade the rxjs version to the latest minor version. We pinned it for consistency :)
If you'd like please send a PR with the change.
Sure I can send in a PR. I'd suggest using yarn.lock and/or package.lock to maintain consistency, which will still allow consumers to use and lock to their own versions.
Hi, I see that you've pinned to rxjs version
5.2.0
instead of following semver with something like^5.2.0
. I am also using rxjs in my add-in, but at a different (more recent) version. Because of this, I now have two versions of the same package being bundled. Is it possible to use a more generous range forrxjs
in this package?Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: