-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cyclic types definition #116
Labels
Comments
Oleg-N-Cher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2022
Oleg-N-Cher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2022
Oleg-N-Cher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2022
Oleg-N-Cher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 27, 2022
Oleg-N-Cher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 27, 2022
Oleg-N-Cher
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 27, 2022
These examples show how Ofront+ generates code for cyclic types: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It's a question of supporting definitions like that:
which is implemented by BlackBox.
The Oberon community believes that such cyclic type definitions are not something very useful or indispensable. So their support in Ofront+ should only be considered a step towards improving compatibility with BlackBox.
The examples that show different cases of defining such types:
CyclicTypes.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: