Fix for issue #497 Scheme client #498
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Uh oh, I think I merged your PRs in the wrong order. The first one I merged contains a revert that conflicts with this one, trying to untangle now. |
|
Sorry for the confusion. Had a little trouble trying to keep things in their own little boxes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sorry, had to create another branch in my fork to isolate my other PR from this one.
I copied the interrupt function from the Racket client instead of the Python client because the Racket one uses the
send-signalfunction from the base functionality inremote/stdio.fnl.