Update dependency remark-flexible-markers to v1.2.1

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
remark-flexible-markers	1.0.4 -> 1.2.1

---

Release Notes

ipikuka/remark-flexible-markers (remark-flexible-markers)

v1.2.1

Compare Source

The changes made by @​talatkuyuk

• updated the dependencies
• added a badge for npm downloads in the README
• corrected some typos in the README
• made some refinements in types
• fixed: the option markerProperties shouldn't have "className" key in the returned object, if there is, the plugin deletes the entry from returned object so as not to effect the <mark> attributes

v1.2.0

Compare Source

The changes made by @​talatkuyuk

• missing keys are added for color classifications into the dictionary
• the tsconfig.js is updated
• the dependencies are updated and added new dependencies
• the type of settings is improved and now, it is partially required on the type of options
• a second visitor is added to find marker syntax if the content to be marked contains other phrasing contents, fixes https://github.com/ipikuka/remark-flexible-markers/issues/2
• minor breaking change: the name of the option doubleEqualityCheck is changed with the equalityOperator
• a third visitor and the option actionForEmptyContent option is added for empty content markers
• the @types/mdast is extended with the Mark type
• the regex for matching mark syntax is updated, and it is more strict now
• a test util is added and the tests are updated
• the new types TagNameFunction and ClassNameFunction are added into the exported type FlexibleMarkerOptions in order the options markerTagName and markerClassName can take a callback functions respectively
• test coverage is added %100 and connected with codecov
• type coverage is added %100
• the badges are updated in README.md including coverages
• package-lock.json file is added for fixing a github action
• npm provenance is applied and an action for pull requests is added into github actions
• the README.md is completely re-written

It is more powerful now

As of version ^1.2.0, the remark-flexible-markers can handle also the syntax containing other markdown phrases like strong, emphasis, link etc. See https://github.com/ipikuka/remark-flexible-markers?tab=readme-ov-file#it-is-more-powerfull

==**marked bold content**==
==_marked italic content_==
==[marked link](https://google.com)==

It is more strict now

The double equity signs must be adjacent to the content. Here is an example for bad usage, and cause to not work.

== text with unwanted space==
==text with unwanted space ==

It is more flexible now

The options markerTagName and markerClassName can take a callback function in addition to string, now.

type TagNameFunction = (color?: string) => string;
type ClassNameFunction = (color?: string) => string[];

{
  // ...
  markerTagName?: string | TagNameFunction;
  markerClassName?: string | ClassNameFunction;
  // ...
);

For more information see https://github.com/ipikuka/remark-flexible-markers?tab=readme-ov-file#markertagname and https://github.com/ipikuka/remark-flexible-markers?tab=readme-ov-file#markerclassname

In addition to that, a new option actionForEmptyContent?: "keep" | "remove" | "mark" is added to handle mark syntax with empty content. See https://github.com/ipikuka/remark-flexible-markers?tab=readme-ov-file#actionforemptycontent

Please pay attention to a minor breaking change that the name of the option doubleEqualityCheck is changed with the equalityOperator, the behavior is the same.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.31%. Comparing base (27a0dfd) to head (ed0217f).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6436   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.31%   67.31%           
=======================================
  Files         541      541           
  Lines       65192    65192           
  Branches     5415     5415           
=======================================
+ Hits        43882    43884    +2     
+ Misses      21310    21308    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.