-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
41.25 fps from sensor sc223a (sc5239s) #1324
Comments
https://smartsens.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com/web/products/SC223A_V3.0.pdf |
Thank you for the info. OK, so I think the sensor distinction has to be corrected before changing any values for the wrong sensor. |
Do you have a datasheet on your sensor? Read its hardware ID to confirm the model. |
SC5239s would be a 5MP sensor, not 4MP. First digit denotes the resolution. If you were sold it as a 4MP, that should raise question if it is a legitimate hardware and if it is a 2MP SC223a instead. |
I bought the sensor here: aliexpress. It is definitely not only 2 MP. |
Very reassuring. You know what? I have a bridge to sell you. |
Sorry, I would not doubt your expertise.
How much? ;)
Thank you. I was unaware of the sensor labeling.
No.
Ok, I will try now. |
How do I get the hardware ID?
Here some dmesg output:
|
Thank you. Here my results:
|
Now you need values from registers 0x3107 and 0x3108 at address 0x30. These are the most common with Smartsens sensors. |
|
ipctool is kinda stupid and does not include the last region in the sequence. Use 0x3107 0x3109 range. |
|
SC223A 0x60 0x3107:0xCB 0x3108:0x3E 30 1920x1080 |
Alas, you got tricked by the seller. |
Maybe, but:
@themactep
|
You have the device ID. I don't know what alternative evidence you are looking for, but I usually try to not getting involved in religious debates and debates with whitneses of SC5239S. That is a pink unicorn sensor even the manufacturer is not aware of. Google the name, you will get all kind of grifters advertizing it with parameters from 3mp to 5mp and mysteriously shapeshifting sizes. It is the new black to upscale resolution from a shitty 2mp sensor to 2k output, or whatever the soc can handle. E.g. Cinnado D1 2K camera is equipped with SC2336 sensor. Same for dozens of other cameras on the market. Beacause marketing, and people are The fps you get is from isp, not the sensor. |
Here you can see a capture of the stream clearly showing 41 unique frames per second with high-resolution-timer in vid, confirmed by @widgetii. Nothing religious, pure data. ;) |
There's possibility that it's SC233A which is capable of 1080p@60fps |
Thank you all for helping. Here we got the proof that chip ID
At the moment, This issue will be resolved here: OpenIPC/ipctool#112 |
You can get 41.24 fps on gk7205v210 with sensor sc5239s (which openipc labels sc223a), not only 30 fps.
Set
fps: 45
in /etc/majestic.yaml andIsp_FrameRate=45
in /etc/sensors/sc223a_i2c_1080p.ini.majestic output:
Majestic says it can
Not support Fps: 45
, but it is running faster than only with fps: 30 settings.So should this be the new default for sc223a, even if the value you set (45 fps) is not exactly what you will get from sensor (41.24 fps) ?The video looks more fluently. The frames are unique. No double frames are produced.
Can someone owning a sc223a please confirm the frame rate after changing the 2 lines?Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: