-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Documentation in User's Guide #259
Conversation
I've added some clean up. Mind only your table should be put under "revisions" any other information should stay in "info". There are also still occurrences of email addresses for contact that need to be updated. |
One thing that is missing is that we should probably make use of the domain openipsl.org also in the User's Guide and top level package documentation. |
Would it be a good idea to sort the publications by year and replace all those "links" by doi links? |
Yeah, I know that. I might have forgot about one or two. I will check that now. |
maybe when we have the entire list updated for 2.0 |
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ The <b>Open-Instance Power System Library - OpenIPSL</b> contains many power sys | |||
</p> | |||
<p> | |||
This is a very short <b>User's Guide</b> that will try to help users to get familiar with the library providing general information about the <b>OpenIPSL</b>. | |||
More information about the library can be found in this <a href=\"https://openipsl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/\">website</a> dedicated to the OpenIPSL organization. | |||
</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you got the wrong address here. readthedocs should not appear anywhere. The content should actually be removed. It is openipsl.org that is the correct address.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this what you meant?
OpenIPSL/package.mo
Outdated
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ If you are looking for an introduction to the library, have especially a look at | |||
<ul> | |||
<li><a href=\"modelica://OpenIPSL.UsersGuide\">User's Guide</a> | |||
and all its dependencies for general information about the library.</li> | |||
<li><a href=\"https://openipsl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/\">openipsl.org</a>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same problem here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are still some formulations in the User's Guide that I would like to go through but that can wait for the final release. Good enough for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I forgot one thing. This pull request should also remove all the now superfluous sphinx documentation files that are still present.
@dietmarw do you want to keep something or do you just want to remove the docs folder (I don't remember if that's the folder that only contains the website stuff)? |
These have now been converted into the UsersGuide also taking the updates from OpenIPSL#219 into account.
178ac90
to
d03c838
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the PR needed to get rebased on latest branch any way I've now also removed the doc/
directory at the same time. It's good to merge now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for going back and forth on this one. But I remembered that we are still missing the links to the verification data that is hosted on the dedicated repository. So that information should added to the verification section.
The repository itself is private right now. When we make it public we can put the link to the repo. However, we already have the link to the website with the comparison results. |
Yes I was only talking about the website, the the source repository |
But I have already mentioned the website in the result verification page. |
This PR tries to include every piece of documentation we have to be inside the library, within user's guide.