Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for auto mode of Ja Rule #803

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

peternewman
Copy link
Member

Not sure which branch I'm supposed to merge into, I still need to fix input validation too.

@peternewman peternewman added this to the 0.9.6 milestone Jun 29, 2015
if_nametoindex inet_ntoa inet_aton select socket strerror \
getifaddrs getloadavg getpwnam_r getpwuid_r getgrnam_r \
getgrgid_r secure_getenv])
if_nametoindex inet_ntoa inet_ntop inet_aton inet_pton select \
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are ready for #788 .

@nomis52
Copy link
Member

nomis52 commented Jun 29, 2015

I think it would be much easier if we just avoid passing --enable-jarule to the pi build slaves.

I want to remove this flag as soon as I can, so there isn't much to gain by trying to make it complicated.

@peternewman
Copy link
Member Author

We could do, but that involves a chunk of buildbot copy/paste, and when we remove the flag, we'll still need some logic to build Ja Rule automatically if possible (although I guess that could be in ifdefs in the code).

@nomis52
Copy link
Member

nomis52 commented Jun 29, 2015

I'd prefer to copy and paste in buildbot rather than here.

My goal is for the ja-rule code to be build if the libusb plugin is enabled and the appropriate version is met. That way we can get rid of the flag all together.

@peternewman
Copy link
Member Author

Okay, understood.

@nomis52 nomis52 closed this Jun 29, 2015
@peternewman peternewman removed this from the 0.9.6 milestone Jun 29, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants