-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sqlparser: update code to conform to upstream sqlparser-rs changes #2510
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ crate-type = ["rlib"] | |
[dependencies] | ||
anyhow = {workspace = true} | ||
|
||
sqlparser = {git = "https://github.com/OpenLineage/sqlparser-rs/", branch = "release"} | ||
sqlparser = {git = "https://github.com/OpenLineage/sqlparser-rs/", branch = "fix_snowflake_stage_no_parens"} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why do we want to rely on feature branch? If there is any particular reason to do that, pls specify PR that we need to merge in another repo. Otherwise it may be difficult to change this in future. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Because if we merge the sqlparser-rs changes first here: OpenLineage/sqlparser-rs#5 it would break the main: so the algorithm is
|
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the advantage of replacing one test scenario with another?