[COMMON] feat: Add support for SCRIPT type jobs in BigQuery

[kacpermuda]

Problem

When using SCRIPT type jobs in BigQuery, no lineage is extracted, because SCRIPT job has no lineage information - it only spawns child jobs that have that information.

Solution

Extract lineage information from child jobs when dealing with SCRIPT type job.

I removed query string from BigQueryJobRunFacet - it can increase event size a lot and it's already included in SqlJobFacet so it's not necessary here.

I also added deduplication of input and output datasets to avoid duplicates in case the script job writes to / read from a table multiple times.

One-line summary:

Checklist

• You've signed-off your work
• Your pull request title follows our guidelines
• Your changes are accompanied by tests (if relevant)
• Your change contains a small diff and is self-contained
• You've updated any relevant documentation (if relevant)
• Your comment includes a one-liner for the changelog about the specific purpose of the change (if necessary)
• You've versioned the core OpenLineage model or facets according to SchemaVer (if relevant)
• You've added a header to source files (if relevant)

---

SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
Copyright 2018-2023 contributors to the OpenLineage project

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.05882% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.00%. Comparing base (03484a8) to head (0327c74).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ion/common/openlineage/common/provider/bigquery.py	97.01%	2 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2564      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.47%   84.00%   -0.48%     
==========================================
  Files          59       54       -5     
  Lines        3356     3225     -131     
==========================================
- Hits         2835     2709     -126     
+ Misses        521      516       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JDarDagran]

I love you've made it backwards compatible with notice of deprecation 🚀
Maybe it's time we should really get rid of this dependency and keep logic only in Airflow integration? Same goes for RedshiftDataDatasetsProvider. It's of course not the subject of this PR, just raising this. cc @mobuchowski

Would it be also possible to modify existing BQ integration test?