Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] added filtering for protein group scores #4802

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 3, 2020

Conversation

jpfeuffer
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ class TOPPIDFilter :
registerTOPPSubsection_("score", "Filtering by peptide/protein score.");
registerDoubleOption_("score:pep", "<score>", 0, "The score which should be reached by a peptide hit to be kept.", false);
registerDoubleOption_("score:prot", "<score>", 0, "The score which should be reached by a protein hit to be kept. Use in combination with 'delete_unreferenced_peptide_hits' to remove affected peptides.", false);

registerDoubleOption_("score:protgroup", "<score>", 0, "The score which should be reached by a protein group to be kept. Use in combination with 'delete_unreferenced_peptide_hits' to remove affected peptides.", false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't know maybe this needs a bit more explanation what the difference between score:prot and score:protgroup is.
Would it even make sense to just use score:prot and have the new semantics?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I think it is important if people actually care about specific isoforms to filter for single protein scores.
Hmm.. I think the difference is clear, the question is whether people know the implications.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't say for the casual user.
E.g., is it clear that score:protgroup includes single proteins? Most would probably guess no

@jpfeuffer jpfeuffer merged commit afc0d61 into OpenMS:develop Jul 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants