Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDF extension display in browser distorted #1316

Closed
ygherman opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 13 comments
Closed

RDF extension display in browser distorted #1316

ygherman opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 13 comments
Labels
invalid This issue is invalid for some reason and should be closed Type: Bug Issues related to software defects or unexpected behavior, which require resolution.

Comments

@ygherman
Copy link

ygherman commented Nov 9, 2017

Hi,
I'm having a display issue with the rdf extension, in the skeleton editing window.
The display in chrome and firefox (these are the browsers I've checked) of the skeleton editing windows is distorted that I cannot edit and configure all the fields I need.

Attached is the view of the display I'm getting:

image

thx.

@wetneb
Copy link
Sponsor Member

wetneb commented Nov 9, 2017

@ygherman hi, we are aware of this issue but the RDF extension is not maintained by this team. I think this extension is looking for a maintainer actually.

@wetneb wetneb closed this as completed Nov 9, 2017
@wetneb wetneb added Type: Bug Issues related to software defects or unexpected behavior, which require resolution. invalid This issue is invalid for some reason and should be closed labels Nov 9, 2017
@fpompermaier
Copy link
Contributor

fpompermaier commented Nov 9, 2017 via email

@ettorerizza
Copy link
Member

@fpompermaier
Copy link
Contributor

fpompermaier commented Nov 9, 2017 via email

@wetneb
Copy link
Sponsor Member

wetneb commented Nov 9, 2017

@fpompermaier just fork it and you'll be the owner :)

@ettorerizza
Copy link
Member

ettorerizza commented Nov 9, 2017

The Github repo does not mention a type of license. I don't know who owns the intellectual property. This extension was developed within the DERI research center, which no longer exists, I believe, or has been merged. The best is to ask the authors (The second is cygri).

EDIT : it's a BSD licence, according to the official website.

@thadguidry
Copy link
Member

thadguidry commented Nov 9, 2017

All software produced in DERI is BSD licensed. Even if @fmaali doesn't recall :) He and Richard mentioned it once in a talk http://refine.deri.ie/

Fork it and update the license text so it uses the 3 clause BSD https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause

@fpompermaier
Copy link
Contributor

@wetneb I was referring to an official ownership...the right term is repository transfer: https://help.github.com/articles/about-repository-transfers/

@wetneb
Copy link
Sponsor Member

wetneb commented Nov 9, 2017

@fpompermaier my point is that you don't need to transfer the repository at all! If you start maintaining your own fork of it, you'll be de facto the owner of the "official" repo. That's the good thing about FOSS! :)

In other words, there is no such thing as ownership: there is only maintained and unmaintained forks…

@magdmartin
Copy link
Member

@fpompermaier Please lets us know what is the new project URL so we can promote and redirect users.

@fpompermaier
Copy link
Contributor

fpompermaier commented Nov 10, 2017 via email

@ettorerizza
Copy link
Member

@fpompermaier For your information, here is another fork that I have not tested, but quite recent. However, it uses a modified version of Open Refine with Jetty9, if I understand correctly, and I don't remember why.

@stkenny
Copy link
Contributor

stkenny commented Nov 28, 2017

@ettorerizza I had to modify Open Refine to remove the dependency on xerces-j. It was the only way I could find to resolve classpath problems with the extension. I'll look at bringing the forks up to date to see if the extension works with the latest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
invalid This issue is invalid for some reason and should be closed Type: Bug Issues related to software defects or unexpected behavior, which require resolution.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants