-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 709
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
opensc-notify.exe(from OpenSC 0.20.0-rc2) - Win10( ver1809) - too high processor load #1874
Comments
Could you send a debug output log OpenSC? Most likely, there is some unhandled error: OpenSC/src/tools/opensc-notify.c Lines 82 to 90 in ce71b17
Please check if the problem persists after attaching a reader (empty or with card). |
Solved in OpenSC-0.20.0 release |
The issue still persists, see #1903 for a more detailed analysis |
frankmorgner
added a commit
to frankmorgner/OpenSC
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders fixes OpenSC#1874
3 tasks
frankmorgner
added a commit
to frankmorgner/OpenSC
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders fixes OpenSC#1874
frankmorgner
added a commit
to frankmorgner/OpenSC
that referenced
this issue
Mar 21, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders fixes OpenSC#1874
frankmorgner
added a commit
to frankmorgner/OpenSC
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders - fixes interrupt handling in opensc-notify on Unix fixes OpenSC#1874
frankmorgner
added a commit
to frankmorgner/OpenSC
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders - fixes interrupt handling in opensc-notify on Unix fixes OpenSC#1874
frankmorgner
added a commit
to frankmorgner/OpenSC
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders - fixes interrupt handling in opensc-notify on Unix fixes OpenSC#1874
frankmorgner
added a commit
to frankmorgner/OpenSC
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders - fixes interrupt handling in opensc-notify on Unix fixes OpenSC#1874
frankmorgner
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2020
- If readers are attatched, the new reader is probed for a card to check if a notification needs to be sent - removal of readers are not notified to the user, we assume that PC/SC sends the correct card removal event - The list of readers to be monitored is adjusted once a reader (dis)appears - On macOS, without PnP notification, we always check for new/removed readers with SCardListReaders - fixes interrupt handling in opensc-notify on Unix fixes #1874
5 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Problem Description
Too high processor load on win10 enterprise (ver 1809, build 17763.805 ) by opensc-notify.exe without activity. Still, continuous 30%.
My CPU: Intel Core i5 - 5300U 2,3GHz
Proposed Resolution
I don't know if the opensc-notify process can be disabled in the opensc.conf configuration. That would be temporary help.
Steps to reproduce
Only install OpenSC-0.20.0-rc2 version.
Logs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: