You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
... the specs are contradictory there. It says only SBML-entities may show up there, but later an example says observables can be included. If observables can be included, it needs to be clarified whether observableTransformation is to be applied or not.
Opinions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When allowing observables, the additional question occurs on which scale these should be.
By only allowing states, everything can be achieved by jut copying the observable formula in if observables are needed.
I would suggest to no allow observables which are defined within the observable file. This avoids a lot of headache.
(Assignment rules in the SBML are obviously fine.)
If no-one disagrees, let us then decide that observables are not allowed. This makes implementation easier for the different tools, and does not restrict anything effectively as mentioned above.
... the specs are contradictory there. It says only SBML-entities may show up there, but later an example says observables can be included. If observables can be included, it needs to be clarified whether observableTransformation is to be applied or not.
Opinions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: