Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify whether observables may occur in noiseFormula #368

Closed
dweindl opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Clarify whether observables may occur in noiseFormula #368

dweindl opened this issue Mar 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested specification change

Comments

@dweindl
Copy link
Member

dweindl commented Mar 6, 2020

... the specs are contradictory there. It says only SBML-entities may show up there, but later an example says observables can be included. If observables can be included, it needs to be clarified whether observableTransformation is to be applied or not.

Opinions?

@dweindl dweindl added question Further information is requested specification change labels Mar 6, 2020
@yannikschaelte
Copy link
Member

When allowing observables, the additional question occurs on which scale these should be.
By only allowing states, everything can be achieved by jut copying the observable formula in if observables are needed.

@JanHasenauer
Copy link
Contributor

I would suggest to no allow observables which are defined within the observable file. This avoids a lot of headache.
(Assignment rules in the SBML are obviously fine.)

@yannikschaelte
Copy link
Member

If no-one disagrees, let us then decide that observables are not allowed. This makes implementation easier for the different tools, and does not restrict anything effectively as mentioned above.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested specification change
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants