You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment we do not allow constant species in the condition table. To have these concentrations condition-specific, the current way to go would be to turn those species into parameters. For the simulation this is fine.
However, this takes away the possibility of listing those species as reaction modifiers, which makes sense in terms of underlying biology and for model visualization. Furthermore, keeping those species as SBML species would allow for better annotation.
What was the motivation for not allowing constant species in the condition table?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At the moment we do not allow constant species in the condition table. To have these concentrations condition-specific, the current way to go would be to turn those species into parameters. For the simulation this is fine.
However, this takes away the possibility of listing those species as reaction modifiers, which makes sense in terms of underlying biology and for model visualization. Furthermore, keeping those species as SBML species would allow for better annotation.
What was the motivation for not allowing constant species in the condition table?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: