-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plans to make pycoMeth compatible with Modkit bedMethyl format? #10
Comments
Hi I came here with the same question, doesn't look like there is an answer to this yet. @bernardo-heberle , have you found a way to perform differential methylation analysis on data generated via R10 flow-cells and modkit? Cheers Skabbi |
Hi Skabbi, I got no answer for this. It looks like modkit does have a module for differential methylation analysis in their documentation under I have not had the time to dig deep into this yet, if I find a way to make the output from modkit compatible with pycoMeth I will post an update here. But to be honest that is pretty low on my priority list right now so it might be a while. Cheers, |
Hei, thanks for the reply @bernardo-heberle! Thanks again Skabbi |
Hello,
Because of the improvements in modified basecalling accuracy
Nanopolish
states that it does not support R10 flowcells on its GitHub. It also seems that Oxford Nanopore is investing in this new tool suite called Modkit for analysis of base modification. I was wondering if there are any plans for pycoMeth to start supporting thebedMethyl
files created by thepileup
function frommodkit
? Alternatively, do you know of a way to convert thebedMethyl
files frommodkit
into theMetH5
format fromNanopolish
so that they are compatible withpycoMeth
?I really like the ease of use and great features included in pycoMeth. It would be great to be able to easily integrate it with the new R10 data pre-processed using
modkit
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: