Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[vio-pipeline] Add 'vehicle_lidar_odometry' alias to 'vehicle_odometry' uORB msg #10513

Open
TSC21 opened this issue Sep 18, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

Comments

@TSC21
Copy link
Member

TSC21 commented Sep 18, 2018

Purpose: Add a new external estimation input based on 360º/multidirectional lidar pose estimation/SLAM. This would be an input from a RTPS stream, or even from Mavlink. The idea is to fuse this as a new estimation/sensor source to feed into the estimator, which can be used together with a VIO input.

Concerns:

  1. If the input comes from ODOMETRY Mavlink msg, then new MAV_FRAME entries need to be added for the lidar case;
  2. Verify how we can bring this to EKF2 as well.
@TSC21
Copy link
Member Author

TSC21 commented Jan 29, 2019

@jkflying FYI

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 24, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@TSC21
Copy link
Member Author

TSC21 commented Jun 24, 2019

Still relevant

@stale stale bot removed the Admin: Wont fix label Jun 24, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 22, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Oct 1, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 30, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 30, 2019
@junwoo091400
Copy link
Contributor

junwoo091400 commented Jul 27, 2022

Is it still relevant?

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jul 27, 2022
@TSC21
Copy link
Member Author

TSC21 commented Jul 27, 2022

Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants