Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates to wording #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2020
Merged

Updates to wording #11

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2020

Conversation

anirmal1
Copy link
Collaborator

Mostly clarifying that emission differences are not a result of type of audio/video but rather differences in compression + visual composition

index.idyll Outdated
@@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ When you listen to audio on your device, you generally load a compressed version
[/div]

The _NPR_ podcast shown in the visualization was compressed to 128 kilobits per second, while the song "Old Town Road", retrieved from Spotify, was compressed to 256 kilobits per second.
This means that in the one minute timespan that both audio files played, twice as much data needed to be loaded for the song than for the podcast, which leads to the song having roughly twice as large of a carbon footprint.
This means that in the one minute timespan that both audio files were played, twice as much data needed to be loaded for "Old Town Road" than for "Digging into 'American Dirt'", which leads to the song having roughly twice as large of a carbon footprint.
The fact that the song has greater carbon emissions is not a reflection on the carbon footprint of songs versus podcasts, but rather the difference in how each provider compresses its audio.
Even so, these audio examples have lower carbon emissions than most of the multimedia websites shown earlier.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your changes look good Aishwarya!

I did have a comment on the sentence before your edits though (the one that begins with "The NPR podcast..."). Should we explain what compressing to X kilobits per second means? It sounds a bit jargony.

@haldenl haldenl mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2020
47 tasks
@anirmal1 anirmal1 force-pushed the wording-edits branch 2 times, most recently from 88912d7 to 32d1996 Compare October 15, 2020 03:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants