Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Permissions: Fix PHP Warning when the user role is invalid #2649

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

vaurdan
Copy link
Contributor

@vaurdan vaurdan commented Jul 16, 2024

Description

There are certain scenarios where the user role might be invalid - the role has been deleted, for example - and therefore, the roles array in the WP_User object might not have any data on the 0 index.

This PR adds an additional validation that checks if this array key is set, and if not, returns false.

This prevents an issue where a Warning: Undefined array key 0 warning can be thrown if there is no valid role associated with the user.

Motivation and context

Improve the reliability of the plugin's codebase and prevent PHP errors and warnings from filling the logs.

How has this been tested?

Manually tested.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected the user role setting check before verifying post edit capabilities, ensuring proper permission handling.

@vaurdan vaurdan added this to the 3.16.1 milestone Jul 16, 2024
@vaurdan vaurdan self-assigned this Jul 16, 2024
@vaurdan vaurdan requested a review from a team as a code owner July 16, 2024 09:55
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 16, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Base branches to auto review (4)
  • develop
  • add/.*
  • fix/.*
  • update/.*

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update involves enhancing the current_user_can_use_pch_feature function within class-permissions.php by adding a check to ensure the current user's role is correctly set before verifying their capability to edit posts. This aims to improve the security and robustness of the permissions check.

Changes

File Summary of Changes
src/class-permissions.php Added a check for the correct setting of the current user's role before verifying if the user has the capability to edit posts in the current_user_can_use_pch_feature function.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Not applicable for this set of changes.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/class-permissions.php (1)

89-92: Validate user role before proceeding with permission checks.

The addition of a check to ensure the user's role is set correctly is a crucial improvement. This change prevents potential PHP warnings when the roles array is empty or the expected role is not present. The implementation adheres to best practices by checking the existence of the array key before accessing it, which is a common practice in PHP to avoid Undefined array key warnings.

However, consider adding a debug or error log here to aid in troubleshooting cases where the role is unexpectedly absent. This could help administrators identify configuration issues or unauthorized changes to user roles.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 990a1a5 and 7074acf.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/class-permissions.php (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
src/class-permissions.php (1)

Pattern **/*.{html,php}: "Perform a detailed review of the provided code with following key aspects in mind:

  • Review the HTML and PHP code to ensure it is well-structured and adheres to best practices.
  • Ensure the code follows WordPress coding standards and is well-documented.
  • Confirm the code is secure and free from vulnerabilities.
  • Optimize the code for performance, removing any unnecessary elements.
  • Validate comments for accuracy, currency, and adherence to WordPress coding standards.
  • Ensure each line comment concludes with a period.
  • Verify code compatibility with the latest version of WordPress, avoiding deprecated functions or features."

Copy link

@rinatkhaziev rinatkhaziev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think array_values( $current_user->roles) might be more appropriate?

@WPprodigy
Copy link

WPprodigy commented Jul 16, 2024

Also, shouldn't it be checking all of the roles and not just the presumed first one? Or probably better yet, just using current_user_can()?

@rinatkhaziev
Copy link

I've held off on rolling out the hotfix until @vaurdan or @acicovic are online.

@acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @rinatkhaziev and @WPprodigy, thank you for chiming in and for your suggestions.

I don't remember why I ended up using $current_user->roles[0], and we can consider testing the alternatives proposed. Since the current fix should work though, we're happy to merge it as-is and release a 3.16.1 today/tomorrow.

We can then see if any of the proposed solutions are better and act accordingly.

Let me know of your thoughts.

@acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

In some cases, this code could be called before the user object would be initialized properly. Haven't tested, but I don't know if current_user_can() would work here.

@vaurdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vaurdan commented Jul 17, 2024

@rinatkhaziev @WPprodigy thank you both for your feedback!

Since it's actually possible to have multiple roles, I did some changes to the permissions checking to handle that scenario. A good side effect, is that it should also handle when there are users with invalid roles, which seems to be the case of the warning.

I have tested these changes locally, with a user that had two roles, and it is working as expected. @acicovic what do you think of this solution?

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7074acf and 36aca86.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/class-permissions.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/class-permissions.php

@acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks good to me provided we want to have a permissive approach (the role with the most privileges wins).

I'm wondering though if this could raise edge cases (some customers wanting a restrictive approach instead), which would also warrant some UI work. We could provide this in the future though, if we stumble upon it.

Thoughts?

@vaurdan
Copy link
Contributor Author

vaurdan commented Jul 17, 2024

I'm wondering though if this could raise edge cases (some customers wanting a restrictive approach instead), which would also warrant some UI work. We could provide this in the future though, if we stumble upon it.

That's a fair point. However, having multiple roles on the same user is not something that is supported out of the box, it requires either a plugin or custom code. I think that, in that scenario, we could offer them a filter, and they can tweak it to their needs.

@vaurdan vaurdan changed the base branch from develop to prepare/3.16.1 July 17, 2024 11:13
@acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

Agreed that this is an edge case. Hopefully we may never need to deal with it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@acicovic acicovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thanks for working on this!

@vaurdan vaurdan merged commit eaf2a30 into prepare/3.16.1 Jul 17, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@vaurdan vaurdan deleted the fix/warning-invalid-role branch July 17, 2024 12:53
rinatkhaziev added a commit to Automattic/vip-go-mu-plugins-ext that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants