Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Google Java Format 1.17.0 -> 1.18.0 #809

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2023

Conversation

Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Google Java Format compile minor 1.17.0 -> 1.18.0

Release Notes

google/google-java-format (Google Java Format)

v1.18.0

Compare Source

Changes

Full Changelog: google/google-java-format@v1.17.0...v1.18.0


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-Bot commented Oct 3, 2023

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade Google Java Format 1.17.0 -> 1.18.0 (#809)

See:
- https://github.com/google/google-java-format/releases/tag/v1.18.0
- https://github.com/google/google-java-format/compare/v1.17.0...v1.18.0

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.14.0 milestone Oct 3, 2023
@rickie rickie force-pushed the renovate/google-java-format-1.x branch from 1a6cb99 to 082ff16 Compare October 3, 2023 07:01
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2023

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 3, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@rickie rickie merged commit 2c8469f into master Oct 3, 2023
17 checks passed
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/google-java-format-1.x branch October 3, 2023 07:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants