compression/format kwargs for geotiffs

[gottacatchenall]

Closes #160 - support to specify the geotiff driver

[github-actions]

Documentation for this PR at https://poisotlab.github.io/SpeciesDistributionToolkit.jl/previews/PR161/

[tpoisot]

Is there a list of supported drivers that we could check against before trying to use them?

[gottacatchenall]

GDAL provides a list of supported drivers here, although it's possible ArchGDAL or typical GDAL distributions don't support them all

[tpoisot]

I'm looking at that table like

[tpoisot]

but maybe we can stick to the "built-in by default"?

[tpoisot]

GDAL has a list of drivers here: https://github.com/JuliaGeo/GDAL.jl/blob/040bda4ac1b57fbd18239036f08c8b8fcf06849e/test/drivers.jl

So we can stick them in a const, and check that the driver matches. The list isn't exported by GDAL, but we can copy-paste it.

[gottacatchenall]

nice! spatial projection change could also be as easy as an arbitrary kwarg if GDAL/ArchGDAL has a list of valid EPSGs, i can check if they do

[tpoisot]

So, ArchGDAL.listdrivers() should get us the valid driver names. We can work on the valid EPSGs later.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 5.88% and project coverage change: +5.95 🎉

Comparison is base (4c63b82) 48.59% compared to head (3623297) 54.55%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #161      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   48.59%   54.55%   +5.95%     
==========================================
  Files          36       47      +11     
  Lines        1214     1514     +300     
==========================================
+ Hits          590      826     +236     
- Misses        624      688      +64     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	54.55% <5.88%> (+5.95%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
Fauxcurrences/src/bootstrap.jl	0.00% <ø> (ø)
Fauxcurrences/src/utilities.jl	0.00% <ø> (ø)
GBIF/src/occurrence.jl	93.22% <ø> (ø)
GBIF/src/paging.jl	92.00% <0.00%> (ø)
GBIF/src/types/GBIFRecords.jl	92.00% <ø> (ø)
src/integrations/gbif_layers.jl	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/pseudoabsences.jl	0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/io/geotiff.jl	76.36% <66.66%> (-0.28%)	⬇️
...MDatasets/src/providers/CHELSA/chelsa_future_v2.jl	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...impleSDMDatasets/src/providers/CHELSA/chelsa_v2.jl	90.90% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 9 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.