Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add reported but unmodelled benefits #14

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 23, 2020
Merged

Add reported but unmodelled benefits #14

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 23, 2020

Conversation

nikhilwoodruff
Copy link
Collaborator

This adds input variables for all other weekly benefits in the FRS, such as Severe Disability Allowance, Maternity Allowance and more bespoke benefits. Also, the linting has been set at 79 characters per line.

@nikhilwoodruff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also added poverty measures (absolute and relative) with references.

@nikhilwoodruff nikhilwoodruff merged commit d0b1d7b into master Sep 23, 2020
@nikhilwoodruff nikhilwoodruff deleted the development branch September 23, 2020 14:38
@@ -50,16 +50,33 @@ class family_net_income(Variable):
definition_period = ETERNITY

def formula(family, period, parameters):
benefits = [
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
benefits = [
BENEFITS = [

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -50,16 +50,33 @@ class family_net_income(Variable):
definition_period = ETERNITY

def formula(family, period, parameters):
benefits = [
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could family_net_income and total_benefit_value live somewhere outside the reform directories to be more accessible?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yeah, that's definitely a good solution - was thinking of something similar because with the current way is a bit inelegant to redefine in reforms.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants