Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gj/on chain validation #835

Merged
merged 128 commits into from
Jul 20, 2023
Merged

Gj/on chain validation #835

merged 128 commits into from
Jul 20, 2023

Conversation

Gauthamastro
Copy link
Member

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro commented Jul 16, 2023

  1. Removes the Gossip layer and introduces an aggregation layer for Thea and OB signatures
  2. All business logic moved as part of runtime for quick updation

TODO: Update the parachain port location to 8844 in Thea after testnet testing.

test.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

//! Contains common/reusable functionality.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still no changes?

pallets/thea/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/thea/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@35359595 35359595 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Gauthamastro please take a look

pallets/ocex/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pallets/thea/src/validation.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
35359595 and others added 5 commits July 19, 2023 12:50
* clone of each deposit for store and dispose instead of full deposits
vec cloning;
* combined logic for deposit processing and fees collected only if there
are deposits;
* logs levels demoted to debug from info in ocex pallet;
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 25.80% and project coverage change: -2.24 ⚠️

Comparison is base (4667d0e) 40.96% compared to head (305dfb7) 38.73%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           Develop     #835      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    40.96%   38.73%   -2.24%     
===========================================
  Files           48       47       -1     
  Lines         2707     2822     +115     
===========================================
- Hits          1109     1093      -16     
- Misses        1598     1729     +131     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
client/src/lib.rs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
node/src/chain_spec.rs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
node/src/rpc.rs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
pallets/ocex/src/benchmarking.rs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pallets/ocex/src/validator.rs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pallets/ocex/src/weights.rs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
pallets/thea-message-handler/src/benchmarking.rs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
pallets/thea/src/benchmarking.rs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
pallets/thea/src/validation.rs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
primitives/orderbook/src/lib.rs 60.00% <ø> (-5.31%) ⬇️
... and 10 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@serhii-temchenko
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good. Waiting on devops team reply and weights update...

@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro merged commit af8f599 into Develop Jul 20, 2023
3 checks passed
@Gauthamastro Gauthamastro deleted the gj/on-chain-validation branch July 20, 2023 07:29
This was referenced Jul 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants