Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix rpc return part1 #1654

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 20, 2020

Conversation

wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Member

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther commented Nov 18, 2020

So #1615 is rather lengthy. Most of that stuff you already approved, @steve-chavez.

So this is the first 4 commits of that branch, so we can merge them already. Had quite a few merge conflicts when rebasing on master after development has progressed there, and I don't need to repeat that when possible ;)

Resolves #1469.

@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2020
@wolfgangwalther
Copy link
Member Author

Applied the changes as discussed into the relevant commits.

@steve-chavez steve-chavez merged commit 2c52b96 into PostgREST:master Nov 20, 2020
@wolfgangwalther wolfgangwalther deleted the fix-rpc-return-part1 branch November 20, 2020 19:01
wolfgangwalther added a commit to wolfgangwalther/postgrest that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
… type

This is a regression after changing responses for RPCs with INOUT or OUT arguments in PostgREST#1654.

Resolves PostgREST#1930.
wolfgangwalther added a commit to wolfgangwalther/postgrest that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
… type

This is a regression after changing responses for RPCs with INOUT or OUT arguments in PostgREST#1654.

Resolves PostgREST#1930.
wolfgangwalther added a commit to wolfgangwalther/postgrest that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2021
… type

This is a regression after changing responses for RPCs with INOUT or OUT arguments in PostgREST#1654.

Resolves PostgREST#1930.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect behavior of header Prefer: params=single-object on overloaded function
2 participants