Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Images used for release #16580

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 18, 2021
Merged

Conversation

TravisEz13
Copy link
Member

@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 commented Dec 9, 2021

PR Summary

Update Images used for release

PR Context

Release (build and release portions) must use TLS and we are changing to images that enforce that.
Also, add comments for vmImage use which are testing. At those places, it is okay to use Microsoft Hosted pools.

PR Checklist

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 78 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Small
Size       : +47 -31
Percentile : 31.2%

Total files changed: 23

Change summary by file extension:
.yml : +47 -31

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Copy link
Member Author

@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - changes are the same just rebased to fix test failures.

@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 merged commit 67faa48 into PowerShell:master Dec 18, 2021
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 deleted the 1espoolchanges branch December 18, 2021 20:09
TrapGodBrim pushed a commit to TrapGodBrim/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2022
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 added the CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log label Feb 24, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 24, 2022

🎉v7.3.0-preview.2 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

daxian-dbw pushed a commit to daxian-dbw/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2022
daxian-dbw pushed a commit to daxian-dbw/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2022
# Conflicts:
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/releasePipeline.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/templates/release-MsixBundle.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/templates/release-ValidateFxdPackage.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/templates/testartifacts.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/vpackRelease.yml
daxian-dbw pushed a commit to daxian-dbw/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2022
# Conflicts:
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/releasePipeline.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/templates/release-MsixBundle.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/templates/release-ValidateFxdPackage.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/templates/testartifacts.yml
#	tools/releaseBuild/azureDevOps/vpackRelease.yml
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 16, 2022

🎉v7.0.9 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 16, 2022

🎉v7.1.6 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backport-7.0.x-Done BackPort-7.1.x-Done Backport to 7.1.x completed Backport-7.2.x-Done CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log Compliance Related to compliance requirements Small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants