Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change New-FileCatalog -CatalogVersion default to 2 #20428

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

ThomasNieto
Copy link
Contributor

@ThomasNieto ThomasNieto commented Oct 3, 2023

PR Summary

Updates the default parameter value from 1 to 2.

PR Context

Resolves #19131

PR Checklist

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 30 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +15 -15
Percentile : 12%

Total files changed: 2

Change summary by file extension:
.cs : +1 -1
.ps1 : +14 -14

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@ThomasNieto
Copy link
Contributor Author

@daxian-dbw think I could get the CI to run again? The test failure isn't related to this change.

Copy link
Collaborator

@iSazonov iSazonov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have we a test for default value?

@ThomasNieto
Copy link
Contributor Author

@iSazonov the existing test using the default value was updated to check the algorithm is now using SHA256 instead SHA1.

@iSazonov iSazonov added CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log Breaking-Change breaking change that may affect users CL-BreakingChange Indicates that a PR should be marked as a breaking change in the Change Log labels Oct 4, 2023
@ThomasNieto
Copy link
Contributor Author

@iSazonov do you have access to kick off CI again?

@iSazonov
Copy link
Collaborator

iSazonov commented Oct 9, 2023

Macos Test-Connection test was restarted.

@StevenBucher98 StevenBucher98 added the PowerShell-Docs needed The PR was reviewed and a PowerShell Docs update is needed label Oct 9, 2023
@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw merged commit 4621c9e into PowerShell:master Oct 16, 2023
38 checks passed
@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

microsoft-github-policy-service bot commented Oct 16, 2023

📣 Hey @ThomasNieto, how did we do? We would love to hear your feedback with the link below! 🗣️

🔗 https://forms.office.com/r/P926k48jRJ

@daxian-dbw
Copy link
Member

The breaking change was reviewed and approved by the Security WG (see the corresponding issue).

VindSkyggen pushed a commit to VindSkyggen/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Breaking-Change breaking change that may affect users CL-BreakingChange Indicates that a PR should be marked as a breaking change in the Change Log CL-General Indicates that a PR should be marked as a general cmdlet change in the Change Log Extra Small PowerShell-Docs needed The PR was reviewed and a PowerShell Docs update is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update New-FileCatalog -CatalogVersion default to 2
4 participants