Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FOUR-13057 queries with case_title and case_number are not recognized in tasks table #5919

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

devmiguelangel
Copy link

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel commented Jan 4, 2024

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Queries with case_title and case_number are not recognized in the tasks table and "PMQL is not valid" message appears

Solution

  • Add support for case_title, case_number and process_name fields in PMQL queries

How to Test

  1. Import attached process
  2. Create a new request
  3. Fill any Name in New input field (for example test1)
  4. Click on the submit button
  5. Go to the Tasks tab
  6. FIrst scenario:
    a. Type case_title="CASE TITLE" in seach input (for example case_title="test1")
    b. Type enter
  7. Second scenario:
    a. Type case_number=CASE# in search input (for example case_number=41)
    b. Type enter

Related Tickets & Packages

FOUR-13057

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next
ci:deploy

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@tokensPM
Copy link

tokensPM commented Jan 4, 2024

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-ee079867ec.eng.processmaker.net

Copy link

@tokensPM
Copy link

tokensPM commented Jan 5, 2024

QA server was successfully deployed https://ci-ee079867ec.eng.processmaker.net

@caleeli caleeli self-requested a review January 5, 2024 14:28
@caleeli caleeli merged commit e33b64a into feature/FOUR-11530 Jan 5, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants