Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The pager in templates does not work correctly when you do a non-existent search #6099

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2024

Conversation

marcoAntonioNina
Copy link
Contributor

@marcoAntonioNina marcoAntonioNina commented Jan 26, 2024

Issue & Reproduction Steps

When the filter is used, the page stays with the last one that was changed.

Solution

  • Switch to the first page when using the filter.

How to Test

  • Have multiple pages of process templates.
  • change to another page other than the first.
  • When the search is performed it should change to the first page.

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@estebangallego estebangallego left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, great job @marcoAntonioNina!

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit 94bf78b into next Jan 28, 2024
8 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants