Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create BUILD.MD #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2020
Merged

Create BUILD.MD #28

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2020

Conversation

iamjuarez
Copy link
Contributor

  • simplify Readme.md for UX
  • transfer detailed build instructions to Build.md
  • pending: edit Build.md

* clean Readme.md for UX
* transfer build instructions to build.md
* pending: edit Build.md
This was referenced Jul 5, 2020
@yerkobits yerkobits merged commit 089c5cd into ProsusCorp:master Jul 5, 2020
yerkobits added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2020
transfering detailed build to #28
@Goro2030
Copy link
Contributor

Goro2030 commented Jul 6, 2020

@yerkobits Looks like by accepting this pull request you overwritten the one I did that was WAY awesome-er with the details from both sites in it... can you revert back?

@yerkobits
Copy link
Member

@yerkobits Looks like by accepting this pull request you overwritten the one I did that was WAY awesome-er with the details from both sites in it... can you revert back?

The text fragment on Readme.md is the abstract; your detailed text on Build.md is the paper.
Many projects on GitHub use this format, especially cross-compiling project (we use CMAKE files).

@Goro2030
Copy link
Contributor

Goro2030 commented Jul 6, 2020

OK. I never saw this, but if it is the way it is, well ;)

prosus-money pushed a commit to prosus-money/prosus-gui that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2021
transfering detailed build to ProsusCorp#28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants