Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dependency (Substrate/Polkadot/Frontier/Cumulus/...) update to v0.9.40 #2202

Merged
merged 67 commits into from
May 25, 2023

Conversation

nbaztec
Copy link
Contributor

@nbaztec nbaztec commented Apr 1, 2023

What does it do?

  • update to v0.9.40
  • introduces warp-sync

Important Changes

Substrate

Cumulus

Frontier

⚠️ Breaking Changes ⚠️

  • SetMembersOrigin is now configured to use also the GeneralAdmin track

@nbaztec nbaztec added B7-runtimenoteworthy Changes should be noted in any runtime-upgrade release notes D9-needsaudit👮 PR contains changes to fund-managing logic that should be properly reviewed and externally audited breaking Needs to be mentioned in breaking changes labels Apr 3, 2023
@crystalin
Copy link
Collaborator

It seems to fail with cargo build --release --features=try-runtime also

@crystalin
Copy link
Collaborator

I also tried ./target/release/moonbeam --base-path /tmp/warp-test --sync warp --blocks-pruning 256 --state-pruning 256 -- --sync warp --blocks-pruning 256 --state-pruning 256 and get spamming error:

2023-04-11 11:01:50 [Relaychain] if watch returned an error: rtnetlink socket closed
2023-04-11 11:01:50 [Relaychain] failed to read from netlink socket: Custom { kind: Other, error: "A Tokio 1.x context was found, but it is being shutdown." }
2023-04-11 11:01:50 [Relaychain] netlink socket stream shut down

@nbaztec
Copy link
Contributor Author

nbaztec commented Apr 19, 2023

build works now, but warp-sync still fails with:

$ ./target/release/moonbeam --base-path /tmp/warp-test --sync warp --blocks-pruning 256 --state-pruning 256  -- --sync warp --blocks-pruning 256 --state-pruning 256
2023-04-18 18:49:16 Moonbeam Parachain Collator    
2023-04-18 18:49:16 ✌️  version 0.31.0-02b81f3ff04    
2023-04-18 18:49:16 ❤️  by PureStake, 2019-2023    
2023-04-18 18:49:16 📋 Chain specification: Moonbeam    
2023-04-18 18:49:16 🏷  Node name: absurd-rail-9979    
2023-04-18 18:49:16 👤 Role: FULL    
2023-04-18 18:49:16 💾 Database: RocksDb at /tmp/warp-test/chains/moonbeam/db/full    
2023-04-18 18:49:16 ⛓  Native runtime: moonbeam-2300 (moonbeam-0.tx2.au3)    
2023-04-18 18:49:17 Parachain id: Id(2004)    
2023-04-18 18:49:17 Parachain Account: 5Ec4AhPVjsshXjh8ynp6MwaJTJBnen3pkHiiyDhHfie5VWkN    
2023-04-18 18:49:17 Parachain genesis state: 0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000074e54bafcf1ecdce51867078fa16f2902751d11473628ac19e89a5be20df326203170a2e7597b7b7e3d84c05391d139a62b157e78786d8c082f29dcf4c11131400    
2023-04-18 18:49:17 Is collating: no    
2023-04-18 18:49:18 [🌗] 🔨 Initializing Genesis block/state (state: 0x74e5…3262, header-hash: 0xfe58…b76d)    
2023-04-18 18:49:18 [🌗] 👴 Loading GRANDPA authority set from genesis on what appears to be first startup.    
Error: Service(Client(Execution(Other("Exported method GrandpaApi_grandpa_authorities is not found"))))

node/service/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
node/service/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nbaztec nbaztec marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2023 10:08
node/cli/src/command.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@crystalin
Copy link
Collaborator

@girazoki the test for XCM fails
node ./node_modules/.bin/mocha -r ts-node/register tests/test-xcm/test-mock-dmp-queue.ts

[
  'treasury.UpdatedInactive.[875624120372174,1382629026773089]',
  'system.ExtrinsicSuccess.[{"weight":{"refTime":259098000,"proofSize":1006},"class":"Mandatory","paysFee":"Yes"}]',
  'parachainSystem.DownwardMessagesReceived.[20]',
  'balances.Withdraw.["0x506172656E740000000000000000000000000000",1000000000000000]',
  'balances.Deposit.["0x6d6F646c70632f74727372790000000000000000",122864400000000]',
  'treasury.Deposit.[122864400000000]',
  'polkadotXcm.AssetsTrapped.["0x5346907f0d1a1614c52b7bc79d98161f7dc37c415691a8229d4b1165024f1c52",{"parents":1,"interior":{"here":null}},{"v3":[{"id":{"concrete":{"parents":0,"interior":{"x1":{"palletInstance":3}}}},"fun":{"fungible":385678000000000}}]}]',
  'dmpQueue.ExecutedDownward.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",{"complete":{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",9,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",10,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",11,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",12,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",13,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",14,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",15,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",16,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.OverweightEnqueued.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0",17,{"refTime":12286440000,"proofSize":826650}]',
  'dmpQueue.MaxMessagesExhausted.["0xdfac9648a6d2babcedf34d0ae2c120771fdbb6247eccd38d20de1d8cf81cc9c0"]'
]

The test is supposed to be computing the weight but I don't understand what it gets wrong

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 23, 2023

Coverage generated "Thu May 25 07:47:38 UTC 2023":
https://s3.amazonaws.com/moonbeam-coverage/pulls/2202/html/index.html

Master coverage: 72.61%
Pull coverage: 70.88%

precompiles/utils/macro/src/precompile/expand.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@notlesh notlesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I'm concerned about some of the new proof_size benchmark values, do you think they might reduce block fullness if they are overestimates? (If they're underestimates, they're still better than 0...) See my other comment for more context.

// Measured: `2479 + x * (79 ±0) + y * (38 ±0)`
// Estimated: `32988 + x * (405 ±0) + y * (195 ±0)`
// Minimum execution time: 94_976_000 picoseconds.
Weight::from_parts(83_764_148, 32988)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This storage_proof size is probably excessively high because it depends on at least one Vec in storage... eww.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Notice that the generated code here has _ separators for time but not proof size. I'm guessing Parity doesn't have many benchmarks where proof_size > 999...

@@ -290,6 +290,17 @@ export class XcmFragment {
return this;
}

// Add one or more `BuyExecution` instruction
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Add one or more `BuyExecution` instruction
// Add one or more `RefundSurplus` instruction(s)

.joinCandidates(MIN_GLMR_STAKING, maxDelegationsPerDelegator)
.signAsync(randomCandidate)
// We split the candidates since they won't fit in a single block
for (const randomCandidatesChunk of chunk(randomCandidates, 50)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test always breaks, hopefully this alleviates that! 👍

T::Erc20TransferGasLimit::get().saturating_mul(T::WeightPerGas::get().ref_time()),
0,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@librelois is 0 good here ?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, it's not good, I will fix that on a follow up PR

@crystalin crystalin dismissed nanocryk’s stale review May 25, 2023 12:28

outdated/resolved

@crystalin crystalin merged commit 62ddcf2 into master May 25, 2023
26 checks passed
@crystalin crystalin deleted the upgrade-v0.9.40 branch May 25, 2023 12:28
timbrinded pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2023
* update to v0.9.40

* update benchmarking weight template

* fix build

* make test compile

* Includes page heap fixes

* compile runtime-benchmarks

* make warp sync work

* toml sort

* fix editorconfig

* use new substrate version

* fix warp sync

* sort

* fix --dev

* remove duplicate SetMembersOrigin

* toml-sort

* remove kitchensink-runtime

* fix builkd

* use new weights

* set manual weights for xcm fungible

* use Weight::from_parts

* use 0 pov_size for ref_time weight

* update nimbus

* exclude generated weight files from editorconfig

* fmt

* fmt

* fix rust tests

* fix import

* fix tests

* use Weight part pov_size to 0

* make dalek test work

* fix transfer tests

* use BoundedVec for auto compound delegations

* fix modexp test

* fix modexp test

* fix tests

* fix weight tests

* fix staking tests via chunking

* fix modexp test

* fix lint and test

* fix rust weight tests

* fix partial ts tests

* temp fix for xcm v2

* Fixes weight until benchmarking is fixed

* set manual weight, fix ts tests

* Adds temp hack for xcm tests

* Use RefundSurplus as the no-op for saturating the queue, which does not have pov

* Update evm to 0.39

* Revert "Update evm to 0.39"

This reverts commit 882b85e.

* upgrade polkadot for better support of xcm v2

* prettier

* prettier

* Revert temp fix for XCM weight

* upgrade polkadot fork

* Fixing hrmp-mock tests

* clean up

* prettier

---------

Co-authored-by: crystalin <alan.sapede@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: librelois <c@elo.tf>
Co-authored-by: girazoki <gorka.irazoki@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: tgmichel <telmo@purestake.com>
@crystalin crystalin changed the title update to v0.9.40 Dependency (Substrate/Polkadot/Frontier/Cumulus/...) update to v0.9.40 Jun 9, 2023
@notlesh notlesh added D1-audited👍 PR contains changes to fund-managing logic that has been properly reviewed and externally audited and removed D9-needsaudit👮 PR contains changes to fund-managing logic that should be properly reviewed and externally audited labels Aug 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
B7-runtimenoteworthy Changes should be noted in any runtime-upgrade release notes breaking Needs to be mentioned in breaking changes D1-audited👍 PR contains changes to fund-managing logic that has been properly reviewed and externally audited
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants