Add missing attributes to BranchProtection Jan 2024

[jodelasur]

Fixes #2862. Also added other missing attributes.

All attributes added:

• allow_force_pushes
• allow_deletions
• required_conversation_resolution
• lock_branch
• allow_fork_syncing

Used scripts/add_attribute and added attribute tests accordingly using existing replay data.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (603896f) 96.69% compared to head (438312b) 96.70%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2793   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.69%   96.70%           
=======================================
  Files         142      142           
  Lines       14533    14568   +35     
=======================================
+ Hits        14053    14088   +35     
  Misses        480      480           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[EnricoMi]

While you are there, can you add all other missing attributes as well, please?

https://docs.github.com/en/rest/branches/branch-protection#get-branch-protection

[JayChanggithub]

"Hi @jodelasur, we're interested in adopting these functionalities. Could you expedite the merging of the pull requests, or do you have any suggestions for directly incorporating these modules? Thanks!"

[jodelasur]

@JayChanggithub , waiting for further review from @EnricoMi to have this merged.

[treee111]

also fixes #2373 in my opinion. well, maybe not fully...

question @jodelasur:
is this PR only for reading the added fields of branch protection via

1. branch.get_protection()

or also editing branch protection for these fields via e.g.

2. branch.edit_protection(allow_force_pushes=True)

while testing for me it seams that only 1. is added with this PR
thanks for your work @jodelasur 👍

[EnricoMi]

Superseded by #2873, added you as co-author to appreciate your contribution.