Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Basic Cross Compile Support #327

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 1, 2019

Conversation

mtp401
Copy link
Contributor

@mtp401 mtp401 commented Jan 24, 2019

This PR implements basic cross compile support. When cross compiling, the target python interpreter cannot be invoked since it may be built for an incompatible architecture (e.g. an armv7 target on an x86_64 host). Instead, attempt to parse the target interpreters compilation options out of it's headers.

@kngwyu
Copy link
Member

kngwyu commented Jan 28, 2019

Thanks!
But I'm sorry I don't know what the patchlevel.h is and what parse_header_defines does.
Could you please explain them more?

@mtp401
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtp401 commented Jan 28, 2019

I think the comment for parse_header_defines sums up the behavior of that function. It takes a path to a C header and parses every single line #define X Y statement into a HashMap entry that maps X to Y. patchlevel.h is where cpython keeps all of the versioning information associated with the python interpreter. You can take a look at patchlevel.h for Python 3.8.0 as an example.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kngwyu
Copy link
Member

kngwyu commented Jan 29, 2019

Thanks!
I still don't like the situation we need the header file only to know the python configs, but other than that, I'm 👍 for this PR.

build.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
build.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/exceptions.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@konstin
Copy link
Member

konstin commented Jan 30, 2019

Thank you for your pull request!

Please add some documentation about how to use cross compiling with pyo3, ideally with instructions on installing the required software. Please move the documentation to a chapter in the book. Some instructions about required software and cargo invocations would also be helpful.


As far as I can see, the only mandatory information from the header files is the major and the minor version. Would it be possible to pass the major and minor version through environment variables or features, so you wouldn't even need to have the python version installed to build a native module? This is nothing I expect you to implement, but something that could be very useful even for same-platform compilation.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mtp401
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtp401 commented Jan 30, 2019

As for:

As far as I can see, the only mandatory information from the header files is the major and the minor version. Would it be possible to pass the major and minor version through environment variables or features, so you wouldn't even need to have the python version installed to build a native module? This is nothing I expect you to implement, but something that could be very useful even for same-platform compilation.

There are other important pieces of information that are parsed out of pyconfig.h that are dependent not only on the version of Python itself, but also how the interpreter was compiled (Py_UNICODE_SIZE is a good example of this). Additionally, wouldn't you still needed Python installed as you need to link against the interpreter eventually anyway?

@konstin
Copy link
Member

konstin commented Jan 30, 2019

Python 2 there are actually two versions Py_UNICODE_SIZE used and many packages are therefore build for 27m and 27mu. For python 3 however there seems to be one default abi, with python 3.3 even removing the ufor Py_UNICODE_SIZE from the abi. This means that you need those constants for specific python builds (e.g. when you're compiling against a debug build of python), but there's a proper set of defaults we could use otherwise.

Additionally, wouldn't you still needed Python installed as you need to link against the interpreter eventually anyway?

For bin crates, yes, but afaik not for cdylibs. My thought was mostly that it would be super useful if you could build wheels for all supported versions without having to install all those python versions, but then again I'm pretty happy if we get proper cross compilation support for installed interpreters.

@mtp401
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtp401 commented Jan 31, 2019

@konstin this should be good to go. Tested fine on my end.

@konstin
Copy link
Member

konstin commented Feb 1, 2019

Thank you!

@konstin konstin merged commit 423b5d1 into PyO3:master Feb 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants