Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

minor doc fixes #161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2021
Merged

minor doc fixes #161

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2021

Conversation

FabianHofmann
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #160

Change proposed in this Pull Request

Some spelling and duplication fixes in the doc

@euronion
Copy link
Collaborator

Looking mostly good.

The sections for the example might need some additional adjustment but I can't check it locally.

@FabianHofmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

I checked it, looks fine now, otherwise we'll tackle it in a another pr

@FabianHofmann FabianHofmann merged commit 70ca6dd into master Jun 14, 2021
@euronion
Copy link
Collaborator

I just checked. There is now a weird behaviour:

If you jump to RTD everything looks fine at first. Then select "Histroic comparison PV and wind" and the sidebar will change, new menus appear and the selected menu will be renamed to include "... (Germany)".
Select another example and the sidebar returns to normal. :/

@FabianHofmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmh, I cannot reproduce. Maybe some "intelligent" cookies which loaded the old style?
when i have the section selected like here https://atlite.readthedocs.io/en/master/examples/historic-comparison-germany.html everything seems to be fine.

@fneum
Copy link
Member

fneum commented Jun 14, 2021

mmh, I cannot reproduce. Maybe some "intelligent" cookies which loaded the old style?
when i have the section selected like here https://atlite.readthedocs.io/en/master/examples/historic-comparison-germany.html everything seems to be fine.

Yes, delete and rebuild locally

@euronion
Copy link
Collaborator

euronion commented Jun 14, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[JOSS] minor sphinx docs improvements
3 participants