Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deduplicate SliceOrInt (backport #11844) #11853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Feb 21, 2024

This is an automatic backport of pull request #11844 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

* Deduplicate SliceOrInt

After doing some post-merge analysis on the impact of #11842 it turns
out the enum being modified in that PR was duplicated in the rust code
unnecessarily. The same enum was already defined in the
euler_one_qubit_decomposer module for it's custom 1 qubit gate sequence
return type. This commit updates the code so it just use the one
defined in the circuit data module that has the fix from #11842 applied
already.

* Move enum to common location

(cherry picked from commit 802ac51)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2024 16:57
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

@github-actions github-actions bot added performance Changelog: None Do not include in changelog Rust This PR or issue is related to Rust code in the repository labels Feb 21, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7992738079

Details

  • 0 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • 15 unchanged lines in 2 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 89.278%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
crates/qasm2/src/parse.rs 6 97.62%
crates/qasm2/src/lex.rs 9 90.68%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7980536767: -0.01%
Covered Lines: 58897
Relevant Lines: 65970

💛 - Coveralls

@jakelishman jakelishman added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into stable/1.0 with commit b5311eb Feb 21, 2024
12 of 14 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/1.0/pr-11844 branch February 21, 2024 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: None Do not include in changelog performance Rust This PR or issue is related to Rust code in the repository
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants