Adapting to Coq PR #14598: adding an explicit constr_expr node for projections. #230
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ojections. This leads to some simplification of the CApp constructor which does no serve anymore to encode projections.
liyishuai
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2021
3 tasks
|
Please merge. |
|
@Lysxia call for |
Lysxia
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
CAppandCAppExplconstructors lose the part of their syntax which served to encode projections and this leads to some simplifications.This has to be merged synchrounously with coq/coq#14598. Thanks in advance.