Add test for adding JSON-LD to guess_format() #1408
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ajnelson-nist
added a commit
to casework/CASE-Utilities-Python
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
rdflib 6.0.1 upgraded `guess_format()` to report JSON-LD (via PRs 1403 and 1408). With the functionality upstream, this patch moves towards completing tech. transfer by deprecating the local implementation. References: * RDFLib/rdflib#1403 * RDFLib/rdflib#1408 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
ajnelson-nist
added a commit
to casework/CASE-Utilities-Python
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
rdflib 6.0.0 improved filename-based format recognition. (Tests for recognition were upgraded to support JSON-LD in PR 1408.) This patch removes explicit-but-redundant functionality. References: * RDFLib/rdflib#1408 Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a follow-on patch to:
e778e94
Test was confirmed to pass by running this on the current
masterbranch, and confirmed to fail with e778e94 reverted.
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson alexander.nelson@nist.gov
Proposed Changes