Release 2021.07 - RC2 #230
Labels
Comments
|
Looking good \o/ |
Not sure, why this wasn't added to the gist though :-/ |
|
Also 1.4 is missing... maybe due to a race condition due to the release tests running in two jobs. |
is editing the post serialized somehow? |
Nope, each job searches for the comment with the marking HTML comment on its own, changes it internally and then pushes the content. So easily a case for a race condition. Might need some check before pushing if the comment changed in the meantime. Serializing the editing would be much more complicated (and not allow for local execution properly) because we would need to have some kind of addition process running somewhere where the jobs can send their intermediate results (not sure this is possible with Github Actions even). |
|
Nevertheless: the results are still viewable in the run, and Murdock marks the OP comment as before. |
|
It is at least quite a bit more readable now and somehow an ever improving system. I quite like how fast we are moving with this. |
|
and by we I mean @miri64 doing all the work and me just clicking merge 😆 |
|
|
|
Task #5 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 multicast echo with samr21-xpro/cc2538 -> Pass with 0 packet loss |
|
Task #6 (Experimental)- ICMPv6 link-local echo with samr21-xpro/cc2538 |
|
Task 11 - UDP exchange between iotlab-m3 and Zephyr: PASSED I tested against Zephyr v2.6. Zephyr on samr21-xpro RIOT on iotlab-m3 |
08. Interop. Task #5 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through RIOT border router.PASSEDEDIT: I used the wrong RIOT version before. Now it's fine. |
08. Task #6 - UDP between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through RIOT border router08. Task #7 - UDP between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through RIOT border router (200b payload)Both PASSED |
|
Thanks very much for testing! |
|
Task #7 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 multicast echo with samr21-xpro/zero + xbee (PASSED) |
|
Task #8 (Experimental) - ICMPv6 echo with samr21-xpro/zero + xbee |
|
Task 03 - UDP exchange between iotlab-m3 and Contiki: PASSED RIOT node Contiki node |
|
Task #5 (Experimental) - UDP with large payload on iotlab-m3 with three hops (RPL route) has never passed and I guess continues with that. |
|
New name now. |
|
Task #2 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Linux with 6LowPAN Task #4 - ICMPv6 echo between iotlab-m3 and Internet host through Linux with 6LowPAN |
|
ping @benpicco again. |
|
Task #12 - GNRC Border Router with WiFi uplink to the Internet |
|
Can someone verify Task #13 - GNRC Networking I cannot ping the border router from with the node (ie, I cannot ping gnrc_border_router with gnrc_networking). I am using esp32-wroom-32 for both. It is the same for the last release so I am sure I am missing something. |
|
A simpler test would be can someone ping an esp32 running the border router and wifi uplink with an esp32 running gnrc_networking |
|
Do you have |
|
border router node |
|
try |
Heh, true true, still some issues but maybe I should look a bit closer.
```
2021-07-13 17:02:34,534 # Iface 9 HWaddr: 24:6F:28:7C:2E:39 Channel: 11
2021-07-13 17:02:34,540 # L2-PDU:249 MTU:1280 HL:64 RTR
2021-07-13 17:02:34,543 # 6LO Source address length: 6
2021-07-13 17:02:34,544 # Link type: wireless
2021-07-13 17:02:34,550 # inet6 addr: fe80::266f:28ff:fe7c:2e39 scope: link VAL
2021-07-13 17:02:34,553 # inet6 group: ff02::2
2021-07-13 17:02:34,555 # inet6 group: ff02::1
2021-07-13 17:02:34,559 # inet6 group: ff02::1:ff7c:2e39
2021-07-13 17:02:34,560 #
2021-07-13 17:02:34,563 # Statistics for Layer 2
2021-07-13 17:02:34,566 # RX packets 0 bytes 0
2021-07-13 17:02:34,571 # TX packets 0 (Multicast: 0) bytes 58
2021-07-13 17:02:34,573 # TX succeeded 1 errors 0
2021-07-13 17:02:34,576 # Statistics for IPv6
2021-07-13 17:02:34,579 # RX packets 0 bytes 0
2021-07-13 17:02:34,583 # TX packets 16 (Multicast: 10) bytes 872
2021-07-13 17:02:34,587 # TX succeeded 16 errors 0
|
|
Am I missing something for forcing esp_now interface, |
|
Do you get a response to |
|
|
|
ahhh I can ping now... |
|
Only local though... I don't get a global before or after setting |
|
hm works for me™ on esp8266 (with #16638) |
|
I am sure it was user error on my end (something or another as I couldn't get it working on older releases that were tested). Good enough for me. Lets add the fix, I will start RC-3 but only let the automated tests run. |
|
Closing in favor of #232 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This issue lists the status of all tests for the Release Candidate 2 of the 2021.07 release.
Specs tested:
Task Release 2015.12 - pre-RC1 #9 - deprecatedTask Release 2015.12 - RC1 #10 - deprecatedThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: