(Try to) clarify type smileys for .DEFINITE-ness #1502
Merged
Conversation
Based on conversation with @zoffixznet, try to add more context (and definiteness) to the current elaboration for the `:D`, `:U`, and `:_` type constraints. I realize this is also a good place here to show type objects and instances, to support the concept of definiteness. Fixes #1469.
f81802d
into
Raku:master
1 check was pending
1 check was pending
|
Thanks too! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Based on conversation with @zoffixznet, try to add more context (and
definiteness) to the current elaboration for the
:D
,:U
, and:_
type constraints. I realize this is also a good place here to show type
objects and instances, to support the concept of definiteness.
Fixes #1469.