Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Case: Allow extra types on root dataset #182

Closed
ptsefton opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Use Case: Allow extra types on root dataset #182

ptsefton opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
use-case A (potential) use-case for ROLite creation, consumption or integration
Milestone

Comments

@ptsefton
Copy link
Contributor

ptsefton commented Dec 6, 2021

As a profile designer I want to have additional types on the root dataset to simplify writing profiles - the current use case is wanting to be able to double up with "RepositoryCollection" (pcdmCollection) or "RepositoryObject" (pcdm:Object) to distinguish between collections and "actual data".

@ptsefton ptsefton added the use-case A (potential) use-case for ROLite creation, consumption or integration label Dec 6, 2021
@ptsefton
Copy link
Contributor Author

We're doing this now - does anyone object to it being made legit in the spec?

@stain
Copy link
Contributor

stain commented Jan 27, 2022

I think it should be allowed. This is also useful for profiles #153 if we want to type as prof:Profile which seems a useful type for profiles together with profile nesting prof:isProfileOf

ptsefton added a commit to ptsefton/ro-crate that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2022
@ptsefton ptsefton added this to the RO-Crate 1.2 milestone Nov 23, 2022
stain added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 23, 2023
Changed to text to allow multiple types on root - as per #182 which w…
@stain stain closed this as completed Apr 27, 2023
@stain stain mentioned this issue Apr 28, 2023
29 tasks
ptsefton added a commit to ptsefton/ro-crate that referenced this issue May 2, 2023
…advice on how to reference DOIs to reflect the latest recommendation from Science on Schema.org
stain added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
use-case A (potential) use-case for ROLite creation, consumption or integration
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants