Address Protocol delay_between_messages performance bottleneck

[mvollrath]

This prevents performance problems when multiple clients are subscribing to high frequency topics.

Fixes #203

[T045T]

LGTM 👍

Does anyone else know of a system that would be negatively affected by this change?

[dabertram]

after reading my comments about this parameter.. i think it should be okay to set this to 0.
If I remember correctly, (slow) clients can request their specific throttling rate anyways, right?

On January 17, 2016 4:17:14 PM CET, Nils Berg notifications@github.com wrote:

LGTM 👍

Does anyone else know of a system that would be negatively affected by
this change?

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#204 (comment)

Sent from Mobile Device.

[T045T]

For inter-message throttling, yes.
There doesn't seem to be an easy way to set the message_intervall field in a roslibjs message, so large, fragmented messages might still overload a slow client, but even then it's still possible to just change the parameter on a per-server basis.