-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enh/utc time #110
Enh/utc time #110
Conversation
Haven't taken a complete look at this PR just yet, but it seems like the tests are failing because of the @FranzYuri, can you modify the Let me know if you have any doubts. |
@giovaniceotto , as requested for you, the requirements.txt are now updated. Can you please confirm that everything is in the right format? This file is not familiar for me, but I think that maybe we need specify package version, right? |
@Lucas-KB , could you please take a look at this pull request for us? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Took a while, but I finally got to reviewing this masterpiece! Magnificent work @FranzYuri and @ompro07!
I made some comments, suggestions and raised a question. Let me know what you think. If needed, we can discuss further via discord.
@FranzYuri, I chipped in and did some minor code refactoring. Here are the most significant changes I have made:
I believe there are only two things left:
Do you wish to work on these items on this PR? Otherwise, we can merge this PR after you review my changes and then create a new one focused on the two items left. |
Hey, I'd like to recommend merging this PR and then start a new one including the examples. @FranzYuri do u agree? |
Yes! Sorry for the delay... |
Pull request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
Pull request checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements, depending on the type of PR:
ReadMe, Docs and GitHub maintenance:
Code base maintenance (refactoring, formatting, renaming):
black rocketpy
) has passed locally and any fixes were madepytest --runslow
) have passed locallyCode base additions (for bug fixes / features):
black rocketpy
) has passed locally and any fixes were madepytest --runslow
) have passed locallyWhat is the current behavior?
Currently the output dates on RocketPy are only available in UTC time zone.
What is the new behavior?
Now RocketPy can print dates on local time zones.
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Tanks to @ompro07 for all help, especially with the contributions at https://github.com/Projeto-Jupiter/Hackathon/pull/97/files