Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wip edifact object tree #3

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 16, 2020
Merged

Wip edifact object tree #3

merged 9 commits into from
Sep 16, 2020

Conversation

RovoMe
Copy link
Owner

@RovoMe RovoMe commented Sep 16, 2020

This PR will add a way to generate message structure files by parsing the official UNECE website, which hosts the actual Edifact message type, segment and element specifications

Further this PR will add a way to generate an object-tree for a parsed Edifact interchange, which follows the structure definition of a message interchange.

Last but not least, this PR will also change the Validator implementation to ignore unknown segments and elements by default and only throw an error on such segments/elements if a strict validation was requested

Roman Vottner added 9 commits August 31, 2020 19:53
…he parsed segments. Currently only INVOIC and DESADV segments are supported.
…act definition pages to generate the JSON structure objects used while parsing/validation
…re streamlined directories to fix the eslint issue constantly reported but to only export the actual source classes. Problem currently reported for index.ts is hack-fixed by importing some of the exports during the interchange creation as eslint requires all of the linted files to be included -> chicken/egg problem ...
@RovoMe RovoMe added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 16, 2020
@RovoMe RovoMe self-assigned this Sep 16, 2020
@RovoMe RovoMe merged commit 7f6feaa into master Sep 16, 2020
@RovoMe RovoMe deleted the wip-edifact-object-tree branch September 16, 2020 17:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant