Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2320 apiv3 frontend vstlpe #2365

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 13, 2020
Merged

2320 apiv3 frontend vstlpe #2365

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 13, 2020

Conversation

aviveiros11
Copy link
Contributor

Any background context you want to provide?

Part of the effort to convert the frontend to use API v3

What's this PR do?

See attached issue.

How should this be manually tested?

Verify checks in attached issue are warranted.

Also check the following:
Confirm that there are no usages of the scenarios endpoint outside the scope of swagger?

What are the relevant tickets?

#2320

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 10, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 68.987% when pulling 0490234 on 2320-apiv3-frontend-VSTLPE into 358d168 on develop.

Copy link
Contributor

@macintoshpie macintoshpie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, I think the only thing left is updating the tests in test_tax_lot_property.py, which has references to api:v2.1:tax_lot_properties-export.

I didn't find scenarios used anywhere in tests or on the front end so I think we're good there.

While doing manual testing, I found an unrelated bug. I don't think you need to address it in this PR though: #2370

Copy link
Contributor

@macintoshpie macintoshpie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎊

@adrian-lara adrian-lara merged commit a3a6b03 into develop Aug 13, 2020
@adrian-lara adrian-lara deleted the 2320-apiv3-frontend-VSTLPE branch August 13, 2020 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants