Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Documentation of Stencil example claims #1260

Closed
pagrubel opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Documentation of Stencil example claims #1260

pagrubel opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 5 comments
Assignees
@aserio
Labels
category: documentation
Milestone
0.9.9

Comments

@pagrubel
Copy link
Member

The claim that we outperform OpenMP may have been true before the fix to OpenMP code to make it a fair comparison but now we reach about the same performance.
@hkaiser
Copy link
Member

hkaiser commented Sep 16, 2014

Can you suggest changes to the text itself (a pull request, maybe)?

@hkaiser
Copy link
Member

hkaiser commented Oct 13, 2014

Ping? Can you at least point to the page where you found this claim?

@pagrubel
Copy link
Member Author

https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/blob/master/docs/tutorial/futurization_example.qbk#L127

@hkaiser hkaiser added this to the 0.9.9 milestone Oct 13, 2014
@hkaiser
Copy link
Member

hkaiser commented Oct 13, 2014

@aserio: could you make that change, please?

aserio added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2014
@aserio
Fixing erroneous claims in documentation (ticket #1260)
a16797b
@aserio
Copy link
Contributor

aserio commented Oct 13, 2014

Fixed with commit a16797b

@aserio aserio closed this as completed Oct 13, 2014
aserio added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2014
@aserio @hkaiser
Fixing erroneous claims in documentation (ticket #1260)
0553b60 
(cherry picked from commit a16797b)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@aserio aserio

Labels
category: documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.9.9
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@hkaiser @aserio @pagrubel