Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add num_cores facility #5763

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 5, 2022
Merged

add num_cores facility #5763

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 5, 2022

Conversation

hcq9102
Copy link
Contributor

@hcq9102 hcq9102 commented Feb 3, 2022

  • Aim to control the number of cores in executors
  • A functionality setting the number of cores to be used by an algorithm directly

note: under ..hpx/libs/core/execution/include/hpx/execution/executors/..

@hcq9102 hcq9102 marked this pull request as ready for review February 4, 2022 02:39
Copy link
Member

@hkaiser hkaiser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@hkaiser
Copy link
Member

hkaiser commented Feb 5, 2022

bors merge

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Feb 5, 2022

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 282f5fa into STEllAR-GROUP:master Feb 5, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2022
5831: Further improvement actions to rotate r=hkaiser a=hcq9102

 Aim to further improve **_rotate_** algorithm
  -  Adding core partition functionality: enables the left and right sides of rotate to allocate the number of cores as needed
  - Removing the unneeded asynchronous code: decreases the overheads by removing the third step operation of rotate 

## Any background context you want to provide?
add num_cores facility #5763
Making sure num_cores is properly handled by parallel_executor #5792





Co-authored-by: chuanqiu <chuanqiuhe@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants