Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Machinery experienced an unexpected error. Please file a bug report at: https://github.com/SUSE/machinery/issues/new #2244

Closed
matwey opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@matwey
Copy link

matwey commented Nov 20, 2017

Inspecting unmanaged-files...
Machinery experienced an unexpected error. Please file a bug report at: https://github.com/SUSE/machinery/issues/new
Execution of "ssh matwey@192.168.10.8 -o LogLevel\=ERROR LANGUAGE\= LC_ALL\=en_US.utf8 /home/matwey/machinery-helper --version" failed with status 255 (no error output).

Backtrace:
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/cheetah-0.5.0/lib/cheetah.rb:641:in `check_errors'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/cheetah-0.5.0/lib/cheetah.rb:404:in `run'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/logged_cheetah.rb:23:in `run'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/remote_system.rb:98:in `run_command'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/machinery_helper.rb:77:in `has_compatible_version?'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/plugins/unmanaged_files/unmanaged_files_inspector.rb:77:in `run_helper_inspection'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/plugins/unmanaged_files/unmanaged_files_inspector.rb:60:in `inspect'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/inspect_task.rb:87:in `block in build_description'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/inspect_task.rb:79:in `each'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/inspect_task.rb:79:in `build_description'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/inspect_task.rb:21:in `inspect_system'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/lib/cli.rb:768:in `block (2 levels) in <class:Cli>'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/gli-2.13.1/lib/gli/command_support.rb:126:in `call'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/gli-2.13.1/lib/gli/command_support.rb:126:in `execute'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/gli-2.13.1/lib/gli/app_support.rb:296:in `block in call_command'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/gli-2.13.1/lib/gli/app_support.rb:309:in `call'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/gli-2.13.1/lib/gli/app_support.rb:309:in `call_command'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bundle/ruby/2.1.0/gems/gli-2.13.1/lib/gli/app_support.rb:83:in `run'
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.1.0/gems/machinery-tool-1.23.0/bin/machinery:41:in `<top (required)>'
/usr/bin/machinery:24:in `load'
/usr/bin/machinery:24:in `<main>'
@thardeck
Copy link
Member

Thx for the report. Could this host also be a 32 bit system? It seems that the helper could not be executed or was not copied over properly.

@thardeck
Copy link
Member

According to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14885748/ssh-script-returns-255-error this could happen if the connection was not possible at all because of login issues for example.

What happens if you run ssh matwey@192.168.10.8?

@thardeck thardeck added the Bug label Nov 20, 2017
@matwey
Copy link
Author

matwey commented Nov 20, 2017 via email

@matwey
Copy link
Author

matwey commented Nov 20, 2017

Hi,

This host is 32-bit x86 based openSUSE 11.2.

> uname -a
Linux eagle 2.6.31.14-0.8-default #1 SMP 2011-04-06 18:09:24 +0200 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

@thardeck
Copy link
Member

I think this issue might be a duplicate of #2243 . We will see as soon as the other is fixed.

@thardeck
Copy link
Member

Closing since it seems to be a duplicate of #2243 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants