Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Count number of missing values in column #642

Closed
lars-reimann opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #682
Closed

Count number of missing values in column #642

lars-reimann opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #682
Assignees
Labels
enhancement 💡 New feature or request released Included in a release

Comments

@lars-reimann
Copy link
Member

lars-reimann commented Apr 23, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem?

It would be nice to check the number of missing values for a column easily. Doing this via the missing_value_ratio is not intuitive.

Desired solution

Add a function Column.missing_value_count.

Possible alternatives (optional)

No response

Screenshots (optional)

No response

Additional Context (optional)

No response

@lars-reimann lars-reimann added the enhancement 💡 New feature or request label Apr 23, 2024
@lars-reimann lars-reimann self-assigned this May 1, 2024
@lars-reimann lars-reimann linked a pull request May 1, 2024 that will close this issue
lars-reimann added a commit that referenced this issue May 1, 2024
Closes #642

### Summary of Changes

Add `Column.missing_value_count` to get the absolute number of missing
values in the column.
lars-reimann pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 1, 2024
## [0.22.0](v0.21.0...v0.22.0) (2024-05-01)

### Features

* `is_fitted` is now always a property ([#662](#662)) ([b1db881](b1db881)), closes [#586](#586)
* add `Column.missing_value_count` ([#682](#682)) ([f084916](f084916)), closes [#642](#642)
* Add `InputConversion` & `OutputConversion` for nn interface ([#625](#625)) ([fd723f7](fd723f7)), closes [#621](#621)
* Add hash,eq and sizeof in ForwardLayer ([#634](#634)) ([72f7fde](72f7fde)), closes [#633](#633)
* allow using tables that already contain target for prediction ([#687](#687)) ([e9f1cfb](e9f1cfb)), closes [#636](#636)
* callback `Row.sort_columns` takes four parameters instead of two tuples ([#683](#683)) ([9c3e3de](9c3e3de)), closes [#584](#584)
* rename `group_rows_by` in `Table` to `group_rows` ([#661](#661)) ([c1644b7](c1644b7)), closes [#611](#611)
* rename `number_of_column` in `Row` to `number_of_columns` ([#660](#660)) ([0a08296](0a08296)), closes [#646](#646)
* rework `TaggedTable` ([#680](#680)) ([db2b613](db2b613)), closes [#647](#647)
* show missing value count/ratio in summarized statistics ([#684](#684)) ([74b8a35](74b8a35)), closes [#619](#619)
* specify `extras` instead of `features` in `to_tabular_dataset` ([#685](#685)) ([841657f](841657f)), closes [#623](#623)

### Bug Fixes

* actually use `kernel` of support vector machines for training ([#681](#681)) ([09c5082](09c5082)), closes [#602](#602)

### Performance Improvements

* Faster plot_histograms and more reliable plots ([#659](#659)) ([b5f0a12](b5f0a12))
@lars-reimann
Copy link
Member Author

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.22.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@lars-reimann lars-reimann added the released Included in a release label May 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement 💡 New feature or request released Included in a release
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant